Thursday, December 4, 2025

India vs South Africa 2nd ODI: Markram's Masterclass Steals a Series-Leveling Victory from the Hosts

 


The Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Stadium in Raipur witnessed one of the most thrilling encounters in recent ODI cricket on December 3, 2025, when South Africa executed a masterful chase to overturn India's commanding total and level the three-match series at 1-1. What unfolded was a captivating exhibition of batting prowess, punctuated by moments of individual brilliance, desperate field efforts, and the unpredictable nature of dew-laden evening cricket that ultimately decided the contest's fate. South Africa's four-wicket victory, achieved with just four balls remaining, represented not just a victory but a statement of intent—a reminder that in modern-day ODI cricket, no target is insurmountable when momentum, partnerships, and execution converge at the right moment.




India's Batting Extravaganza: A Total That Should Have Won

Walking into the second ODI, India carried the confidence of a first-match victory, having won the opener in Ranchi by 17 runs. However, the Raipur pitch had different ideas, and so did India's batters, who would go on to produce one of their more complete batting performances in recent times. Under stand-in captain KL Rahul, India posted 358 for 5, a total that appeared commanding, even overwhelming, before the South African chase would provide all the drama and tension that cricket enthusiasts crave.

The foundation of India's innings was laid by the middle-order trinity of Virat Kohli, Ruturaj Gaikwad, and KL Rahul, though their journey to that total wasn't without early hiccups. India's opening partnership of Rohit Sharma and Yashasvi Jaiswal fell apart early, the side reaching a modest 62 for 2 by the middle of the third over. It was a precarious position, the kind that could have derailed lesser batting units. But Kohli's presence at the crease changed everything. The maestro walked in with his pedigree intact and his scoring touch evident, having just notched up his 52nd ODI century in Ranchi. What followed was clinical batting at its finest.


 


Kohli compiled a polished 102 off 93 deliveries, his second consecutive century in this series and the 53rd hundred of his extraordinary ODI career. The shot-making was textbook Kohli—a mix of aggression against the short-pitched deliveries from Marco Jansen, elegant flicks through the leg side against Keshav Maharaj, and powerful strokes through the covers. His fifty came off 47 balls, setting the tone for what would be a high-scoring contest. More importantly, Kohli's presence at the crease seemed to elevate those batting alongside him.

Enter Ruturaj Gaikwad, the Indian Premier League star who has been earmarked as a key player in India's white-ball future. On this December evening in Raipur, Gaikwad introduced himself to international cricket audiences with an exceptional maiden ODI century. His 105 off 83 deliveries was studded with 12 fours and 2 sixes, a strike rate that demonstrated both his aggressive approach and his ability to stay patient when required. What made Gaikwad's innings particularly impressive was his technique against spin bowling. He moved across, used his feet, executed well-timed sweeps against Maharaj, and showed a maturity that belied his relative inexperience at this level. His fifty came off 52 balls, slightly slower than his overall rate, but his acceleration thereafter was evident as he progressed to three figures off just 77 deliveries.

The partnership between Kohli and Gaikwad was the glue that held India's innings together. They added 195 runs for the third wicket in 193 deliveries, a partnership that transformed what could have been a moderate total into a commanding one. The South African bowlers were tested but also contained—Marco Jansen, despite moments of excellence, conceded 63 runs in his spell, while Nandre Burger and the rest of the bowling attack struggled to find consistent lines and lengths.

When Jansen eventually removed both Kohli and Gaikwad in quick succession with slower balls—a tactical masterstroke in modern cricket—India had already built sufficient momentum. Kohli's dismissal came when he was caught off Ngidi for 102, while Gaikwad fell to Jansen for 105, drawing a standing ovation from the Raipur crowd.



The final flourish came courtesy of KL Rahul, who showcased his aggressive credentials with an unbeaten 66 off just 43 deliveries, including 6 fours and 2 sixes. His acceleration, particularly in the final overs against Corbin Bosch, ensured India crossed the 350-run mark convincingly. An 18-run final over from Bosch, which included a six and four from Rahul, gave India the launching pad they believed would secure victory. Ravindra Jadeja contributed a crucial four in that over as well, showing that India had batting depth to spare.

India's total of 358 for 5 represented a strong effort, and on paper, it was the kind of target that should have proven too much for most opponents. Yet, cricket has a unique way of defying expectations, and South Africa's pursuit would prove to be far more successful than any expert prediction might have suggested.

South Africa's Reply: A Chase for the Ages

When South Africa walked in to chase 359 runs—the joint-highest target ever chased down against India (Australia had done it once before in 2019 at Mohali)—they did so without knowing they were about to produce one of the finest chases in recent ODI history. The evening conditions in Raipur, with dew settling quickly and the ball becoming increasingly difficult for the Indian bowlers to control, would prove to be an unwitting ally for the Proteas.

South Africa's chase began with early aggression from their opening pair of Quinton de Kock and Aiden Markram. The first three overs saw them score briskly, collecting five boundaries and establishing early momentum. However, India struck immediately when Arshdeep Singh provided the crucial breakthrough, removing de Kock for 8 runs with a leading-edge catch at mid-on—a dismissal that suggested India's bowlers still had teeth in this contest.

What followed was where Markram's masterclass truly began. The South African opener, batting at the top of the order, took center stage and produced a century of exceptional quality. His 110 off 98 deliveries, adorned with 10 fours and 4 sixes, was the fulcrum upon which the entire chase was balanced. Markram's innings was a lesson in match-situation batting—he played conservatively when needed, yet wasn't afraid to take calculated risks. He and captain Temba Bavuma stitched together a crucial 101-run partnership for the second wicket off 96 deliveries, a stand that essentially set the tone for what was to follow.

One moment, however, proved pivotal in determining the eventual outcome. When Markram had reached 53, Yashasvi Jaiswal attempted a catch at long-on off Kuldeep Yadav's bowling but couldn't hold on. The ball went over the boundary for six—a reprieve that would prove to be one of the most costly dropped catches in recent ODI cricket between these two nations. Markram went on to add 57 more runs after this opportunity, underlining just how expensive that single lapse proved to be.

Temba Bavuma's contribution of 46 off 48 deliveries was crucial in maintaining the run rate, even if his dismissal came to a well-executed short ball from Prasidh Krishna, who hooked it to deep mid-wicket. But the South African captain had done his job—keeping the chase on track and ensuring the pressure remained on India's bowlers throughout.

Matthew Breetzke, the rising star making waves in his early ODI career, proved why he was earmarked for bigger things with a composed 68 off 64 deliveries, featuring 5 fours. His partnership with Markram for the third wicket added 70 crucial runs, and later, his partnership with debutant Dewald Brevis for the fourth wicket was nothing short of sensational. Breetzke has enjoyed an exceptional start to his ODI career, and performances like these suggested his potential was far from being realized.

Dewald Brevis's contribution of 54 off just 34 deliveries was the kind of aggressive batting that accelerates a chase to completion. His strike rate of 158.82 showcased his intent, and his two straight sixes off Kuldeep Yadav in the 40th over provided the impetus India couldn't counter. The 92-run partnership between Breetzke and Brevis for the fourth wicket essentially sealed the contest, despite India's best efforts through various bowling changes.

The final overs saw a tense finish with Tony de Zorzi retiring hurt after scoring 17 runs, but by that point, South Africa's margin of victory was largely determined. Corbin Bosch smashed the winning boundary off Prasidh Krishna's final over, finishing with 2 needed from as many balls. South Africa eventually won by 4 wickets with just 4 deliveries remaining, a testament to the closeness of the contest and the drama that unfolded.

Bowling Struggles and the Dew Factor

While the batting was scintillating, India's bowling performance—particularly in the latter stages—raised concerns about their ODI attack's depth and quality. Prasidh Krishna, a pacer who was expected to provide breakthroughs, proved expensive, taking 2 wickets for 85 runs from his 8.2 overs. This performance invited questions about his selection and role in the Indian setup going forward.

The Indian spinners, considered the backbone of the ODI bowling attack, struggled collectively, taking just one wicket across 21 overs while conceding 147 runs. This statistic alone highlighted how difficult the conditions became as dew made the ball slippery and unpredictable for the spinners. Kuldeep Yadav, despite his three ODI World Cup and domestic performances, couldn't replicate that form here, and Washington Sundar's role and approach continued to raise questions about his place in the XI.

Harshit Rana showed promise in the early stages but became expensive later, while Arshdeep Singh deserved credit for his early breakthroughs, finishing with 2 wickets for 54 runs. However, India's inability to maintain pressure through the middle overs—when South Africa's middle order was batting—proved to be the decisive factor.

The dew, which started settling in around the 15th-16th over, played a significant role in the game's outcome. KL Rahul post-match acknowledged this factor, noting that "losing the toss and dew are making a huge difference" in the series. This statement underlined how environmental factors in cricket, often overlooked in post-match analyses, can be decisive.

Conclusion: A Series Reset and Lessons Learned

South Africa's victory at Raipur leveled the three-match ODI series at 1-1, resetting the narrative and ensuring the third ODI would be a do-or-die contest for both teams. For India, the loss was a reminder that individual brilliance—as demonstrated by Kohli, Gaikwad, and Rahul—sometimes isn't enough if fielding lapses and bowling inconsistency intervene. The dropped catch of Markram would be a moment of regret, and the bowling performance, particularly the spinners' inability to control the run rate, would be areas requiring immediate attention.

For South Africa, the victory demonstrated that they possessed the batting depth and resilience to challenge India on their own soil. Markram's masterclass, coupled with contributions across the order, showed a balanced team performance that bodes well for the remainder of the series and their World Cup preparations ahead.

The stage was set for a thrilling finale in the series, and both teams carried lessons from Raipur into the next encounter—India learning the cost of complacency despite a strong performance, and South Africa proving that even the most daunting targets are achievable with skill, partnership, and a bit of fortune.

Tom Latham’s Long-Awaited Century: A Human Story of Patience, Pressure, and Redemption

 


The morning of December 3, 2025, rose bright over Christchurch’s Hagley Oval, but Tom Latham carried a very different kind of weather within him. The sun was out, the sky was sharp and clear, yet a storm had been gathering behind his calm eyes for almost three years.

                                                                                                              


1073 days.
39 Test innings.
Countless questions about his form.
An unspoken question about his future.

As the New Zealand Test captain walked out to bat, it wasn’t just the West Indies attack he was facing. It was doubt—his, the critics’, and perhaps even a few lingering in the dressing room.

What unfolded over the next several hours wasn’t simply a hundred. It was a release, a reclamation, and a reminder of the cricketer Tom Latham truly is.


A Century Worth Waiting For

The moment the ball from Kemar Roach met the middle of Latham’s bat and sped through the covers for boundary number nine, it felt like the entire country exhaled with him. His arms went up—briefly. A nod to the dressing room. The faintest smile. But the emotion was unmistakable. This wasn’t celebration; it was relief.

This was his 14th Test century.
His first ever against West Indies.
And his first in any format since February 2023.

For most players, a few months without a hundred feels like pressure. For Latham, it stretched into years. Nearly three years of starts that never blossomed, of edges that flew to hand, of lbws that weren’t survived, of that constant, nagging voice: Is he still good enough?

For New Zealand’s most productive Test opener ever, for a captain, for a player with over 10,000 international runs—this drought hurt more than numbers could show.


The Weight of Leadership—and Scrutiny

This hundred landed with extra force because it arrived at a time when Latham needed it most. Taking full-time command of the Test team in October 2024 didn’t give him a honeymoon period; instead, it put every single innings under a microscope.

Fans wondered if he was the right successor to Kane Williamson.
Analysts questioned whether captaincy was draining his batting.
And when injury forced him out of a Test in Zimbabwe in August 2025, murmurs about his durability grew louder.

To make matters tougher, Tom Blundell’s injury meant Latham had taken up wicketkeeping duties too. A top-order batsman, a captain, and a stand-in keeper—rarely does modern cricket demand such a cocktail of responsibilities.

But the best players don’t avoid pressure; they absorb it.

And in this Test, Latham did more than absorb—he rewrote the narrative.


The Innings: A Masterclass in Discipline

This was not a flashy knock; it was a craftsman at work.

The First 50: Patience as a Weapon

His half-century came from 91 balls—measured, calm, careful. His judgment outside off-stump was almost surgical. As former opener Mark Richardson said:

“When you’re out of form, your defensive technique is the first thing that cracks. Tom’s looked stronger than ever today.”

The Second 50: Controlled Brilliance

Once Latham reached fifty, he opened up—slightly, intelligently. His next fifty came from 69 balls, guided by smart cricket rather than aggression. Ravindra played with flair, Williamson briefly provided stability, but Latham held the core.

In the 54th over, after two dropped chances and a growing sense of West Indian frustration, Latham made his move. Back-to-back boundaries pushed him into the 90s. A drive and a quick single sealed his hundred.

It was understated. It was dignified. And it was powerful.


The Numbers That Matter

MilestoneStatisticWhat It Means
Test Centuries14Most by any NZ opener
International Runs10,000+Only 8th Kiwi to cross the landmark
Test Average38.38Respectable for a long-term opener
Tests Played88On track for the 100-Test club
Captaincy Record8 wins, 7 lossesSolid start to full-time leadership

And now he has finally ticked off a century against West Indies, the one team that had always eluded him.


A Captain Growing Into His Role

Latham’s leadership journey is unusual. For years he stood in when Williamson was absent. He won games. He impressed quietly. But being the permanent captain is different—it means shaping a team’s identity.

Since taking charge, he has had to guide:

  • a new generation of batters

  • injury-hit squads

  • difficult overseas tours

  • his own form slump

And through it all, he never lost the respect of his teammates. They call him a “player’s captain”—thoughtful, calm, and consistent.

His partnership with Williamson remains one of New Zealand cricket’s most balanced relationships. When Williamson fell cheaply in Christchurch, Latham responded by tightening his game even further.

That’s leadership—not loud, not dramatic, but steady.


A Personal Fight Behind the Scenes

Numbers don’t show the human story.

Behind closed doors, Latham had been battling self-doubt. The pressure of upholding the Latham name—his father Rod being in the commentary box when he raised his bat—only added weight.

After the shoulder injury in Zimbabwe, many wondered if he was nearing the twilight of his career.

Instead, he went inward.
Hours of nets.
Technical tweaks.
Talks with his father about the mental game.
Quiet rebuilding.

This century is the result of that unseen work.


A Century That Shapes the Series

By the end of day three, New Zealand’s lead had swollen to 297. West Indies were tired, frustrated, and two dropped catches only deepened the sense of a match slipping away.

New Zealand now have a clear script: bat long on day four, declare, and push for a 1–0 lead as they head to Wellington.

With WTC points on the line, Latham’s hundred may become the defining moment of the series.


What Comes Next

The second Test at the Basin Reserve begins December 10. Latham will likely don the gloves again, at least until Tom Blundell recovers. The real test will be consistency—using this century as a foundation rather than an exception.

West Indies will watch every ball he faced in Christchurch, hunting for weakness.

But class adapts.

And Tom Latham has proved he still belongs among New Zealand’s very best.


A Legacy Taking Shape

At 33, Latham still has years left. His numbers already place him among New Zealand’s modern greats:

  • More Test centuries as an opener than anyone else in Kiwi history

  • A strong captaincy record

  • A reputation for technical excellence

  • A genuine chance to enter the 100-Test club

But this century will stand apart.

Not because it was his highest score.
Not because it was the prettiest.
But because of what it meant.


In the End, A Simple Truth

Test cricket is a game of character. Of waiting. Of fighting demons in quiet moments.

Tom Latham waited 1073 days for this.
Nearly three years of silence and struggle.
One innings to wash it all away.

His century at Hagley Oval won’t be remembered for explosive strokes or rapid scoring.
It will be remembered for dignity.

For resilience.

For proving that sometimes the most powerful stories in sport are the quiet ones.

The drought is over.
The doubts are gone.
Tom Latham is back—calmer, stronger, and perhaps better than ever.

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Who won the Tennessee special election — and why it matters

Short answer: Republican Matt Van Epps won the December 2, 2025 special election for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, defeating Democrat Aftyn Behn and keeping the seat in GOP hands — but by a far narrower margin than Republicans have enjoyed in the district in recent cycles. Wikipedia+1





The result, in numbers

According to official and near-final reporting, Matt Van Epps received roughly 53.9% of the vote (about 96,988 votes) to Aftyn Behn’s 45.0% (about 81,044 votes), a margin of roughly 8–9 percentage points. The Associated Press and other outlets called the race for Van Epps as returns tilted in his favor on election night. Wikipedia+1


Why the seat was open

The special election was held to fill the vacancy created when Republican Rep. Mark Green resigned earlier in 2025 to take a private-sector position. The 7th District is geographically mixed — encompassing suburban counties outside Nashville and more conservative rural territory — and has been reliably Republican in recent cycles, which is why the closer result drew national attention. Wikipedia


The campaign: strategy, money and national attention

This special election became a nationalized test of messaging and voter enthusiasm:

  • High-profile endorsements and spending: Van Epps was publicly backed by former President Donald Trump and received significant outside spending from pro-GOP groups and MAGA-aligned organizations; Democrats also invested heavily, with national progressive figures campaigning for Behn. AP News+1

  • Issue framing: Democrats focused messaging on affordability, cost-of-living concerns and suburban discontent — topics that have delivered traction for Democrats nationally — while Republicans ran on culture and security themes and warned against Behn’s progressive positions. The Washington Post

  • Money: Public filings and reporting showed a well-funded Democratic effort and large Republican outside spending; despite being outraised on some reports, Van Epps benefited from late, concentrated spending by conservative groups. The Wall Street Journal+1

That combination of attention, air cover and localized issues turned what historically looked like a safe Republican hold into a national barometer of party momentum.


Turnout and geography: where the game was won and lost

Behn performed best in parts of the district with larger suburban and metropolitan populations — areas where Democrats have made inroads in recent cycles — but underperformed in more rural counties where the GOP base remains strong. Van Epps’ victory relied on holding those rural and exurban margins while cutting the GOP deficit in denser suburbs enough to secure a clear, if slimmer, win. County-level maps and precinct returns show that while Democrats flipped or narrowed margins in several suburban precincts, it wasn’t enough to overcome conservative strength elsewhere. Tennessee Lookout+1


What this means for Congress and 2026

  • Short term: The win preserves the Republican majority in the House and keeps the GOP-held seat from flipping, a practical win for party leaders who had to defend the seat. Reuters

  • Longer term (political signal): The narrower margin — a Republican hold that fell significantly from the 20-point plus margins of prior cycles — is read by strategists from both parties as an indicator of Democratic organizing potential in suburban and exurban battlegrounds, and of possible vulnerabilities for Republicans heading into the 2026 midterms. Both parties will treat the result as a lesson in message discipline and turnout operations. The Washington Post+1


How analysts will judge the race

Political analysts will parse this result on three axes:

  1. Baseline shift vs. one-off: Was this an early sign of a sustained shift toward Democrats in certain suburban corridors, or a special-election anomaly driven by unique local factors and concentrated spending? Early evidence suggests both parties can claim partial victory: Republicans kept the seat; Democrats showed they can compete. The Washington Post

  2. Messaging effectiveness: Which themes resonated — affordability and kitchen-table economics, or cultural and national security messaging — and how transferable are those themes to 2026 contested districts? AP News

  3. Organizational capacity: Which side demonstrated better ground game, early voting turnout and voter contact effectiveness? Special elections are often decided by organization; parties will use the data to refine their 2026 playbooks. The Wall Street Journal


Caveats and context you should keep in mind

  • Special elections are idiosyncratic. Turnout is uneven, and motivated voters can skew results relative to a general election. Comparisons to 2024 margins are useful but not dispositive. Wikipedia

  • Data updates: Vote totals and percentages reported on election night can shift slightly as outstanding precincts and provisional ballots are counted; the margin reported here reflects near-final tallies from multiple reputable outlets. AP News+1


Bottom line

Matt Van Epps’ victory in Tennessee’s 7th keeps the seat in Republican hands, but the outcome — a single-digit win in a district that has been reliably Republican by double digits — is a political headline: it simultaneously offers short-term relief to the GOP caucus and a longer-term signal to Democrats that suburban opportunities exist if they continue to message on economic and everyday issues and sustain organizing investment. National parties will treat the result as both a containment success for Republicans and a roadmap for Democrats as both sides prepare for the 2026 midterms. 

Tarique Rahman: Bangladesh’s Exiled Heir Returns to Shape a New Political Era

  Tarique Rahman: From Exile to Political Frontrunner in Bangladesh Tarique Rahman stands as a central figure in Bangladesh's turbulent ...